Connect with us

False

No Line in 2023 Budget for President Weah’s ”County Tours’

Claim

George Weah placed 10 million USD in the 2023 National budget for his campaign, he calls it ” County tours”.

Rating Justification

On June 27, 2023, a supporter of the opposition Unity Party, Abraham Duogbay Duo Jr. took to Facebook, claiming that “President George Weah placed US$10 million in the 2023 National budget for his campaign, [but] he calls it ‘çounty tours’.”

Mr. Duo Jr. wrote: “Weah spends 3 million USD from our national budget to buy his campaign pickups.!!!!!!! George Weah placed 10 million USD in the 2023 National budget for his campaign, he calls it ” County tours”.

Local Voices Liberia iVerify Team reviewed the national budget and found no proof to substantiate Mr. Dou’s claim, and conclude that the statement is false.

To reach this conclusion, we reviewed the 2023 National Budget. Under code 0100 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, we did not see a specific budget line there for county tours.

Please note that the total amount allocated to the Office of the President in the 2023 budget is US$4,311,750.

Out of this amount, US$800,000 is allocated to the President’s office for Domestic Travel — Means of Travel, US$700,000 is allocated for Domestic Travel — Daily Subsistence Allowance, and US$216,000 is allocated for Fuel and Lubricants for the President’s Vehicles.

When these figures are summed up, you’ll get a total of US$1.7 million for President Weah’s domestic travels and means of travel.

This means the amount allocated for the President’s domestic tours and means of travel is not 10 million as claimed by the poster.

Therefore, we conclude that the claim by Mr. Abraham Duogbay Duo Jr., is false. There is no evidence in the 2023 national budget to validate his claim.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Methodology

True

The claim is rigorous and the content is demonstrably true.


Half True

The statement is correct, although it needs clarification additional information or context.


Unproven

Evidence publicly available neither proves nor disproves the claim. More research is needed.


Misleading

The statement contains correct data, but ignores very important elements or is mixed with incorrect data giving a different, inaccurate or false impression.


False

The claim is inaccurate according to the best evidence publicly available at this time.


Retraction

Upon further investigation of the claim, a different conclusion was determined leading to the removal of the initial determination.


Toxic

A rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is somewhat likely to make you leave a discussion or give up on sharing your perspective. Based on algorithmic detection of issues around toxicity, obscenity, threats, insults, and hate speech;

More in False